OASIS FORUM Post by the Golden Rule. GoldTent Oasis is not responsible for content or accuracy of posts. DYODD.

And honestly you answered your own question

Posted by eeos @ 15:58 on April 30, 2018  

 This means that the law of conservation would have prevented a pancake collapse from happening. Because all of the material was pulverized. If it were pulverized you can’t have the sum of mass+ velocity to come up with the momentum for a pancake collapse. You can’t have energy going into pulverization and also collapsing the floor below it. Sorry couldn’t happen, there’s not enough kinetic energy. Remember conservation of energy does not allow energy to be used twice. And in the end you would have a skyscraper reduced to 30 stories or possibly 40 stories remaining not 4 to 6 stories of rubble. You’re stuck in a circular reference. You have failed logic

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Go to Top

Post by the Golden Rule. Oasis not responsible for content/accuracy of posts. DYODD.