OASIS FORUM Post by the Golden Rule. GoldTent Oasis is not responsible for content or accuracy of posts. DYODD.

Posted by goldielocks @ 23:59 on January 6, 2019  

Levin was good tonight. Finally went after the Repubs like Romney who his guest called a cameleon. Good word, nice was of saying actor. Not a constitutionist or could care less about this country. Moving away from the establishment conservative Cameleons.

TWO January Stocks Seasonals

Posted by Ororeef @ 22:48 on January 6, 2019  

cef-jan6 wpm-jan6

Alex….Yeah, I have problems with a lot of it

Posted by silverngold @ 20:30 on January 6, 2019  

For one thing, the circumference of the object on the right you pointed out appears to be much too small for a 757 but perhaps about right for a small missile? And I have trouble seeing how the nose of a 757 made of aircraft aluminum can penetrate the Pentagon with such a nice clean hole. And yet there were no holes where either jet engine would have entered, so how did such engine or engines get inside the Pentagon without also making an entry hole or holes? And also, in footage that was shown after, they were supposedly cleaning up many pieces of the 757 in the area outside the Pentagon, but take a look at the explosion and afterwards and try to find any of those pieces flying in the air or on the ground during and immediately after the blast. No debris whatsoever. Just saying!

SNG – for the sake of argument , Frame 1:26 shows shapes entering from the right

Posted by Alex Valdor @ 18:49 on January 6, 2019  

I see two white objects ( I have roughly outlined in yellow ) and two shadows ( outlined in blue ) . One of the white objects could be the fuselage of an airliner , and there are gradations in the degree of whiteness from nose to rearward which could be windows ( green ). The second , smaller white object to the left , could be the right wing engine .

I could imagine the wings being sheared off at impact , folded back along the fuselage , pulverized , and the wing tank contents sprayed into an aerosol which would be ignited in a flash by the heat generated during impact .

The problem I have with that scenario , is that the wreckage of a jet engine is recognizable in a photo I saw of the interior of the Pentagon . I find it hard to believe an engine would be recognizable after impact with a stone or concrete building at around 500 mph . And why just one engine ?

what

More Proof

Posted by silverngold @ 14:23 on January 6, 2019  

Freeze frame 1:26- 1:27 FWIW

Anybody still have doubts??

Posted by silverngold @ 14:14 on January 6, 2019  

Thanks Overton

Posted by Buygold @ 11:39 on January 6, 2019  

I’m actually surprised Arch is still alive. Voice from the past.

Not sure he’s getting old but I sure am… 🙂

Go to Top

Post by the Golden Rule. Oasis not responsible for content/accuracy of posts. DYODD.