The crater pictures people posted previously were from the small blast, not the big one, a new picture which clearly shows where the big blast went off just got released by China. After looking through the images of the soviet nuclear tests, the new lake in China appears to have been made by a slightly sub surface burst of at least a 5 kiloton nuclear bomb.
There is no way the earthquake from this was in the 2’s. Take a look at the pond made by a test of a small nuclear weapon ground burst in Russia and compare it to that new lake in China, which is many times as big as the pond made by a nuclear test in Russia!
Now we have limited options for this blast, since nothing stored there could have possibly done this.
This was NOT an accident and the fracture pattern around the crater proves a sub ground burst. If it was a sub ground burst,then a small nuclear weapon is the biggest possibility because once a nuke has to push dirt, the blinding flash will not happen. A slightly subsurface detonation would explain why camera sensors did not get strange artifacts. And if it was not a nuke, it was something else incredibly huge, but not a fuel air bomb because fuel air bombs will not leave craters.
A little bit more of a detailed explanation: If the blast happened at ground level, almost all of the energy would go upwards and the blast would not have made a large deep crater, especially one large enough and deep enough to make that lake. If you look to the right hand side of the lake, you can see fracture patterns in the earth, which were caused by the earth being compressed sideways and not downwards. This would only be done with a sub surface blast. After the blast, the earth bounced back towards the center of the lake, which opened up the cracks.
That type and size of blast crater will only happen if a massive bomb goes off a few feet underground, such as a tactical nuke in a drain pipe which leaves scant few options, No chemical blast did that, PERIOD.
The building that is still standing in the upper right hand side of the frame is a typical example of what is left after a nuclear test, concrete buildings seldom get leveled, but they do get gutted by nuclear blasts. Just look through pictures of the soviet nuclear tests and you will see this. Bottom line? The aftermath is completely consistent with a nuclear blast and nothing else.
I think a glue fire was started as an excuse for this huge blast, which came considerably later. And who knows what made the first big blast, or smaller blasts that led up to it, but I am confident it was a show and not an accident.
They wanted this filmed from all angles and set up the show to make sure people would be recording when the big one went off. If there were lots of little blasts before that, why was there not a single small blast after the big one? That is when I would think the small blasts should have started if this entire scenario was not contrived from the start.
What would be the motive for this attack? I don’t buy the currency devaluation, but something else very tasty was going on that a distraction was needed for, SUCH AS:
You cannot “professionally wipe” a server and then hand it to ANY American intelligence agency, Hillary is BUSTED
The only way you can secure a hard drive that is actually in the hands of the NSA is to either incinerate it or shred it down to dust. It won’t matter if you use Norton Clean Sweep or some other app to purge it, even if a full write was done to the entire drive several times, enough stray magnetic data remains from past writes for the NSA to do a deep analysis of and extract – with errors, but they will at least know what is there, and THIS IS WHY THEY KNOW:
Hillary: THE ISSUE IS NOT THE E-MAILS, THE ISSUE IS THE FACT SHE HAD COUNTLESS SPOOKS INSIDE THE NSA FEEDING DATA STRAIGHT TO THE ENEMY. The mail box is just a diversion from this core fact!
The tribe controlled MSM is trying to pawn off the worst proven case of espionage in America’s history as a “mishandled mail box!” The fact the NSA never found that mail box before Hillary gutted the nation also proves that spooks inside that organization covered it all up!
Hillary’s NSA spooks really are the story of the decade
Let me say this in a very simple way:
The NSA has been able to prove that Hillary had many many moles inside the NSA that used the great surveillance power of the NSA to steal America’s secrets and hand them to the Chinese, the Israelis, and the Russians. These moles were so well entrenched and at such high level that they were able to use the NSA’s own satellite uplink to send the classified data to Hillary.
And if Hillary was able to get this done, who else was able to use the NSA as their own treasure trove of information? Having this happen clearly explains why almost ALL American companies are now Jewish owned, the Jews got EVERY PIECE OF INFORMATION THEY COULD POSSIBLY ASK FOR to assist in their final takeover and destruction of America. Nothing could be bigger or worse than that. It is GAME OVER.
And then we had the impossible Chinese blasts, right at the perfect time to take Hillary out of the news, people love fireworks and now that is all anyone cares about, and the story of the decade – the end of America for Americans goes down the toilet bowl in a great big swirling glurp.
They keep changing the story on what blew up to circumvent analysis. What I have here is what was really claimed to have blown up, and the correct answer for it.
I am not stupid at chemistry. The list of things that were given to cause the blasts does not add up, not even close. Carbide is practically an inert dust that is left laying around openly at steel mills, where melted blobs of metal often fly everywhere.
The actual material being blamed for the blast is butanone. Butanone is airplane modeling glue. You know, that stuff they banned 20 years ago because “kids sniffed it”. Believe me, if it could blow up THAT BADLY modeling glue would have leveled many bedrooms. And then we have a compound of arsenic, which had practically no potential for anything other than creating a nasty gas or burning on the ground, if that, with no boom potential at all.
So let me put it all together here, the story goes like this, if those were the only 3 items in question:
Someone managed to get a bunch of modeling glue burning. And it sat there and burned for 45 minutes (nasty fire there, tough job putting that out, but no boom potential in the context of how it was stored or to even one percent of that magnitude.)
After it burned for a good long time, enough to ensure everyone was watching, somehow some small explosions were touched off to get people to start filming.
Then the MOAB or some other huge explosive device comes in, and blows the whole place to smithereens. Bam-o, perfect show for burying the biggest known act of treason in American history – Hillary’s Wal-Mart of American secrets, open to the highest bidder. If the story is modeling glue, it does not wash for that type of explosion, it just does not work that way.
What would I believe for the Chinese blast?
I’d believe that blast if someone said five thousand gallons of acetone dissolved acetylene went off. I’d believe that blast if someone said an entire semi load of tetra hydrazine went off. But modeling glue? Whoever drew that connection should be sentenced to wearing an underwear hat at the stockade, to be buried under a mountain of rotten eggs and tomatoes. And that is why China sent nothing but weapons experts to the blast scene, 218 in total, because they are not stupid about this.