Being A women has NOTHING to do with qualifications for Presidency ,no MORE THAN being BLACK was a good reason to elect Obama ..How did that work out fer ya ? Yes it also shouldent be a reason for dis-qualification either ! OK ….Lets look further How good a Manager was she ? Thats certainly a requirement for that job considering that the FREE world is at stake NO ?…Either she can manage to do things herself or she can get others to do it by delegating …as long as she gets the job done right ,NO ?
At HP she made the Wrong decision to acquire Compact computer because it was a stagnant technology with a limited future .Well planning for the Future is what a CEO ‘s job is ..ISN’t IT ? She fails that test ! While at HP she took the PORTRAIT of David Packard down and put hers up ..What does that tell you about her …She’s EGO driven and inclined to press ahead even when she’s wrong !
Wheres the Future in that ? To be fair lets go back to her days at LUCENT TECHnology ,what happened to them ? well the pattern of bad decisions was there too, same mistakes ..buying obsolete technologys driven by over sized EGO just to prove she can grow the COMPANY and led to LUCENTS FAILURE and to the LOSS of PENSIONS and everything at LUCENT . Same mistake done TWICE .
Thousand of jobs and Pensions LOST ….A Pattern of Failure !
She makes a point to women that she lost a child to drugs ,well thats a very sad situation and Im sympathetic ,but thats not a qualification for the Presidency ! Is it ? Sympathy has its place as human beings …She evoked that during the debates to play on the Publics sympathy ..thats the EGO coming out again ! Its all about me !
Being a woman dosent qualify her for anything except being a woman.Certainly not for CEO of a Corporation or President .
WE dont need another EGO centric FOOL in the White HOUSE like we have now .
An EGO centric as (ALL Politicians are) SUCCESSFUL candidate would be tolerable ,at least not damage the Country..and could be an ASSET to the rest of us until his ego becomes unbearable .At least we can recover economically first ,than throw him out and do it again !