Posted by Farmboy
@ 14:38 on July 26, 2016
Discovered that little wheel on the mouse and what its designed purpose is for. So when I see a post by Wanka, I immediately place fingertip on wheel, and sloooowwly scroll down to his post, line by line, with just one eye open ( and its squinted ) to make sure its safe for me to see. As Floridagold use to say, a lot, whats been seen cannot be unseen.
If that woman, or thing, whatever she is, becomes President, I am going to save a lot of money cause Im cancelling my cable subscription and I guess donating my radio to Goodwill, cause I cannot even stand to listen to her lying lips.
And I guess we dont have to worry about her wrapping herself in the flag, since they obviously dont allow any in the convention hall. <spit>
Posted by Auandag
@ 14:22 on July 26, 2016
Posted by Maya
@ 14:04 on July 26, 2016
UNINSTALLING HILLARY █████████████▒▒▒ 90% complete.
Posted by Maya
@ 13:57 on July 26, 2016
I gotta agree with Farmboy about that pix! Much as I’d like to pee on that thing, it’s also a major cause of what ‘Seinfeld’ calls “shrinkage”! Makes me want to run away…. screaming…
Posted by Farmboy
@ 13:51 on July 26, 2016
Broke the Law ?
Posted by goldielocks
@ 13:39 on July 26, 2016
In one DNC pic I saw a Palastine flag. Does that count.
Posted by Ororeef
@ 13:35 on July 26, 2016
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.
Why?
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
Posted by Farmboy
@ 13:21 on July 26, 2016
Heard several in the press comment on the fact there were no, not even one, U.S flag inside the DNC convention hall, not even on the stage. Not even shown on one of the big screens. If ever there was a case for a ‘divided nation’ surely this is it. Seems Democrats wish to disassociate with everything American including the Constituition, and now our flag. Makes you wonder, what country do the Democrats represent? What peoples, other than the illegal immigrants? Maybe that is why they have no U.S. flag present, the Democrats are a people without a country. They are in self enforced exile. Can Hillary and the Democrats possibly bring any further shame to themselves or the Democrat Party ? Or for that matter, America.
Hard to believe, but this wide angle view of the DNC meeting tells the story.
I suppose this song would be inappropriate and unwelcome as well? Though some say Obama was ‘moved’ as it was performed at his Inauguration 2013. To me, he and Michelle seem to have tolerated the singing of this song, at best.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zTTQpqIeEU
Posted by silverngold
@ 12:38 on July 26, 2016
I think her campaign has a lot of value and is right on target, especially when there are no fire hydrants or bushes available!
Posted by goldielocks
@ 12:32 on July 26, 2016
Half of them look drunk. A bunch of drunks. Like they’ve been drinking. Pelosi and who ever the arrogant joker who’s on now. Probably off before I get done writing this.
Michele pandering for blacks and women’s vote. One the house built by slaves then her daughter can take for granted that a woman president.that is one of the main problems in America today. These demos taking things for granted. You don’t earn it, you take it for granted. They set the same stage for people coming here taking this country for granted while burning the flag. Same going on in Europe.
Posted by ipso facto
@ 12:14 on July 26, 2016
Posted by commish
@ 11:43 on July 26, 2016
Posted by Samb
@ 11:33 on July 26, 2016
I got a new lap top which came with Windows 10. I prefer my old one that had 7 on it. However, can’t say that I have had any real problems with 10 and it’s been about 2 months now. As far as the Mc Afee live safe that came with the HP computer…well, there is the old Mc Afee and now the new (Intel) Mc Afee which is highly rated. Problem for me is that there are many 10 features that I don’t need and others that I don’t even know how to use yet. All in all i’m ok with 10.
Posted by silverngold
@ 11:19 on July 26, 2016
I just this morning posted this query to another private forum:
To Anyone, Windows 10 free download is coming to an end. So far I have turned it down simply because I don’t believe you can get something for nothing, so when Windows 10 is offered for nothing, and very insistently, IMO there is an ulterior motive behind the offer. I am currently running Windows 7 which has been trouble free….and other family members are running Windows 8 which has had problems. I’m inclined to stay with my Windows 7.
Any opinions on this subject before the deadline at the end of the month?? TIA!!
You guys have convinced me. I’ll keep my Windows 7. Thanks for the discussion.
Posted by amals
@ 11:08 on July 26, 2016
That’s my current thinking. I’m waiting to see if anyone changes my mind. Thanks.
Posted by ipso facto
@ 11:00 on July 26, 2016
I’m keeping Windows 7 for as long as possible. Why mess with success?
Windows 10 has lots of features which spy upon the user.
Posted by amals
@ 10:48 on July 26, 2016
Posted by Farmboy
@ 10:46 on July 26, 2016
I hate it. The geek at the store offered to wipe the drive and install Windows 7 for $75.00. I chose to save the bucks, bad decision.
I was thinking I would load Linux but some folks who know about these things told me it was not a good idea with Windows 10 and that you had to really know what you were doing. So I suffer with this most intrusive operating system.
Posted by amals
@ 10:38 on July 26, 2016
Time is running out on the free upgrade to Windows 10. I’m currently running Windows 7 and like it just fine. I doubt I’ll need or use many/any of the apps and whiz bang features of 10. I mostly just browse the internet on my computer. I’m interested in safety and reliability with reasonable speed. Yay or nay on 10? If I do it, do I want to just follow the prompts that appear (almost endlessly) on my desktop? Do I need to do anything before I let them start (like back up stuff? How?).
Whether I upgrade or keep 7, what’s the best security arrangement? I don’t think the McAfee that comes with the computer is all that good. I do run Malwarebytes and CCleaner from time to time. TIA.
Posted by Farmboy
@ 10:26 on July 26, 2016
I already feel strange using a transgender restroom. The whole time I am looking over my shoulder, which is not conducive to my poor aiming skills to begin with, I can only imagine after looking around, my eyes return to the business at hand and YIKES!, she is staring at me like that. I may never be able to pee again.
I’m already scoping out nearby bushes and trees when out and about, instead of looking for any signs for the restrooms.
And I dont care how politically correct it may be to use the Women’s Restroom, sometimes a man just needs his privacy. I kinda like the sign at the Feed & Seed store. It’s handwritten on a piece of cardboard, and hangs between the Cowboys & Cowgals. ” Confused? Place your hand between your legs, if you feel parts, use the door on the left.”
Posted by ipso facto
@ 10:19 on July 26, 2016
Pebble Limited Partnerships has re ignited the debate around Federal overreach in the mining industry with its latest efforts to overturn a controversial project veto from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Two professors from the University of Alaska have hit back against subpoenas from Pebble, which requested insight into their research records as evidence for the company’s ongoing lawsuit against the EPA. In new court filings, the professors said that the latest ‘burdensome’ and ‘intrusive’ information demands threatened their first amendment rights and were a drain on University money and resources.
The mining company is expanding its hunt for evidence to support its claims that the EPA illegally manipulated scientific results in order to prevent a large scale Gold, Copper and Molybdenum mine in Alaska’s Bristol Bay watershed
cont. http://www.mining.com/scientists-hit-back-against-pebbles-demands-as-epa-fights-lawsuit/
Posted by ipso facto
@ 10:17 on July 26, 2016
… and counseling after they are attacked. The Demos are so magnanimous.
Posted by ipso facto
@ 10:15 on July 26, 2016
Posted by Farmboy
@ 10:10 on July 26, 2016
I think Wanka took delivery of all 20 tons. You know how he likes to sack em and stack em. lol
Both a bracelet and a whistle? Boy, those Democrats take our national security serious ! No expense will be spared to protect our citizens.
Posted by Farmboy
@ 9:54 on July 26, 2016
Because the Democrats are very compassionate and generous of heart. They are even going to provide every American woman with a rape whistle.