Armstrong, I can understand where he’s coming from as far as catalysts for sectors. I can understand why money would flow away from one place to another and makes sense. But this post doesn’t make sense. He keeps talking about reversals and gold promoters and timimg when many stocks are almost at near highs or half way there. That makes getting into these stocks a little more risky on any correction. He is not recognizing as far as stocks that they have done well anymore than Obummer will recognize Radical Islamic T. Like he’s stuck on his computer model. He gives no directions for his numbers. What I see is that there could be volitility ” surprises” indeed in 2017-8 but with “current pattern” to the upside in PMs and most likely beyond.
No Comments
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.