Loading ...Well, I was right on thinking that Farmboy the Frog might kiss a princess someday…whoops, got that one upside down too. Opinions, theories, whattifs, take what you want but don’t shoot the messenger.
There are way bigger phonies to shoot than MA. If you can prove he is part of this mess, shoot him too.
Don’t cha think you’d get along better at the other site, you and all those other bears could get a bunch of vaseline out
Sixpack is not reporting facts! I am and I am flat out stating that MA deleted/scrubed his original negative gold blog dated 12/09/16. Clear enough. I don’t give a flat out damn what his or MA’s predictions are for $Gold. I have my own, right or wrong. Even in this age, people make predictions, then over time are proven very wrong, ….they should at least acknowledge their mistakes. Is that now too much to ask?
Heck, I’d love me a $960/10 buck chuck silver chance. If your notes diverge from MA, take it up with him…
I really have no choice but, to call you out as a BS artist. The MA blog was scrubbed/deleted. My notes on this hopefully will be found. In the meantime I found my post dated 1/14/2016 on this very site. Search under Armstrong. Those are direct quotes that were deleted by MA and they were never challenged by you at that time. For whatever reason you are pumping and schilling for Armstrong. I truly have no dog in this fight but the truth. I don’t know what exactly is your game Joe but, it is becoming obvious that your pumped Guru is not to be trusted.
I have no idea what you are babbling about Armstrong “changing” his post just to deceive one lone village idiot on the Internet that isn’t paying attention. You can view the page exactly as it was captured on Dec 10, 2016 by the Way Back machine. Just put the URL in question here: https://archive.org/web/
And you will see that post never ever changed. He says “Everything is still on target for the move under $1,000 into next year. ”
99.999% of his subscribers and all my investing friends read that as gold will drop sub-$1k sometime in 2017. YOU interpret that to mean Armstrong is saying gold will drop to sub-$1k in the remaining 19 trading days of 2016. YOU are incorrect.
I could see someone who is not paying attention to Armstrong could make that mistake. But for you to come out and say he’s completely 100% wrong when you are obviously wrong and now claiming he changed his post makes you look like a fool when its clear from the way back machine that the webpage is the same today as it was seen on Dec 10th, 2016.
API second largest build ever…DOE tomorrow a game changer if similar…unless…Iran
Well, well, well> I didn’t find my notes yet but, I did find my post dated 1/14/17 0n this very site. Quoting MA 12/09/16: ” Everything is on target for a move under $1000 INTO next year.” Why is that direct quote now missing?? Why did Armstrong scrub his original public blog rather then apologize for his mistake? He not only blew the call but, then went back so as to delete the evidence. Pure and simple there Joe, …Sorry to break into your Guru bubble
Hate to break it to you…
Hey Joe. Do you understand that the MA 12/09/16 blog that you just posted has been scrubbed?? I have it written down…just have to find it. I also posted on this site his quotes line by line a bit of a later date. Instead of apologizing MA erased on his public site: Where in your post is the mention of gold going down into the “Abyss”?? See what I mean?? Instead of apologizing MA scrubbed his public blog so as to erase his mistake. I used to say about MA “Not the sign of an honest man” Now I know it in spades!!
Are we counting lifetimes? 
Their freakin junior coach was a pizza parlor pervert.
This PC inclusive crap doesn’t help. Stamp the disease out.
He’s saying we are on target for a move below $1k in 2017. Something which he has repeatedly said ad nauseam so anyone that pays attention to him is fully aware of this scenario he looking for to play out. What exactly do you not understand about this forecast in this specific blog post? How is it possible to be wrong when 2017 is not yet finished. I think you have a comprehension issue. I am including the link to that public blog post that you referred to. Am I missing something? Or are you just sour grapes?
“Everything is still on target for the move under $1,000 into next year”
Once this gets cranked up look for promos like “Fags for the Flyers”, “Queers for Quebec”, “Trannies for Toronto”, or sigh, “Lesbians for Lightning” (that’s my home team, by the way for my new readers). Of course it means that the players will be forced into sensitivity training, the communities subjected to gay players kissing on the ice, or worse, being forced to wear tutus and play the game without hitting each other until after 9 pm local time to prevent hurting someone’s feelings.
Excuse me now while I vomit, as I’m done being tolerant, understanding, or putting up with this politically correct BS. I may just have to stick with college football as my only sport until they turn it into two handed touch or pink flag football and ruin that great game also.
but sometimes my timing is a bit off. 🙂
What price will gold be at the end of the year? 2016
$1300 – $1400 (30%, 26 Votes)
Higher than $1500 (20%, 17 Votes)
$1400 – $1500 (16%, 14 Votes)
$1200 -$1300 (14%, 12 Votes)
$1100 -$1200 (10%, 9 Votes)
$1000 – $1100 (6%, 5 Votes)
$900 – $1000 (2%, 2 Votes)
Less than $900 (2%, 2 Votes)
Total Voters: 87
| 0.362 | 0.0445 14.02% | 315,980 | 109.7K | No Ranking |
Vol today, 315,980
avg vol, 109,700
Looks like picking up steam.
Shortly before THE December bottom Armstrong stated that Gold would continue Down into the “Abyss” sub $1000 and that gold would then continue down into next year. Not hard to understand Joe. He said that Gold was heading lower and that it would continue lower into next year. This is a public blog post still available to review dated 12/09/16.
Joe six is not acknowledging, nor is Armstrong, a very blown, 180 degree terribly wrong call. Nowhere did Armstrong say that the move down would be anytime in 2017. He called it right then and there for gold to go down and to then continue down into next year. Joe is dishonestly trying to say that we have to wait for 2017 to expire before we can judge the truth of Armstrong’s muffed call. That is NOT what he said. Joe is miffed because his Guru Hero got caught again with his pants down …BIGTIME.
Some way to make your graphics smaller?
I would like to caution people from trading on free public advice from Armstrong. You are getting partial information and not the full roadmap. Here’s the paid for advice that we got and how things play out depended on whether we close above or below $1060 in 2016. If we closed below $1060 we would have gotten that wash out sub-$1k low in January 2017. But since we closed above $1060 this correction plays out an extra year so the intraday low will come in 2018 with the annual low coming in 2017. As with everything in life you get out what you pay for something. So if you expect to rely on free forecasts you are going to get burned.
Because as far as I am aware 2017 is not over yet… so his call for sub $1k gold is still in the cards.
But maybe you are already in 2018? Or maybe English is not your first language as there’s nothing of interest with this call of “Everything is still on target for the move under $1,000 into next year” until another 10 months.
thunder boomers, hail, chance of some twisters…
… cue “ride of the valkyries” loud!