and when you concider he is genetically the same Brain as his brother and FATHER ,that should be taken into consideration .NO?
And then since Law enforcement stated anybody covering up or hiding info about this guy will be considered an accomplice .Therefore his intelligent brother dosent want any connection to him to be even a remote possibility ! NO ? Does he stand to LOSE inheriting his brothers Millions ? YES he DOTH PROTEST TOO MUCH !
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
Hamlet Act 3, scene 2, 222–230
One of the more interesting quotes by Shakespeare: it’s almost always misquoted as “Methinks the lady doth protest too much,” Queen Gertrude’s line is both drier than the misquotation (thanks to the delayed “methinks”) and much more ironic. Prince Hamlet’s question is intended to smoke out his mother, to whom, as he intended, this Player Queen bears some striking resemblances [see THE PLAY’S THE THING]. The queen in the play, like Gertrude, seems too deeply attached to her first husband to ever even consider remarrying; Gertrude, however, after the death of Hamlet’s father, has remarried. We don’t know whether Gertrude ever made the same sorts of promises to Hamlet’s father that the Player Queen makes to the Player King (who will soon be murdered)—but the irony of her response should be clear.
By “protest,” Gertrude doesn’t mean “object” or “deny”—these meanings postdate Hamlet. The principal meaning of “protest” in Shakespeare’s day was “vow” or “declare solemnly,” a meaning preserved in our use of “protestation.” When we smugly declare that “the lady doth protest too much,” we almost always mean that the lady objects so much as to lose credibility. Gertrude says that Player Queen affirms so much as to lose credibility. Her vows are too elaborate, too artful, too insistent.
AND SO ARE HIS ! METHINKS …Ororeef
Loading ...
