Loading ...Yiu might as well stop posting Elliot and just move to a different site. Surely there’s a better fit somewhere else for you, volunteer your time saving folks elsewhere buddy. Science has proven the NIST report to be a complete fraud. 9/11 completely disregards the conservation of momentum and energy. You simply can’t disregard the fact that each tower fell in 12 seconds. But these towers just didn’t buckle steel girders nor was it a pancake collapse.
The conservation of momentum states that the amount of momentum that an object has depends on two physical quantities. The mass and the velocity of the moving object. If two identical masses are colliding and sticking together they will travel at half the speed as the original single mass. But in the case of the WTC mass and velocity we’re not a sum force. We were seeing complete pulverization.
The conservation of energy states that inelastic collisions the sum of the kinetic energy before a collision must equal the sum of the kinetic energy after the collision. This is not possible if some of the energy is used to pulverize the next floor and just fail the floor supports. So what you have is that there’s no mass to transfer the momentum. The momentum will not be increased as the collapse progresses.
Given that the building disintegrated from the top down, it is difficult to believe there could be much momentum to transfer, if any. The sheer energy to pulverize each floor needs to be considered. WTC one or two collapsed in 12 seconds. A ball dropped from a helicopter at the same vertical elevation would have landed in 10 seconds. This was a steel skyscraper, there’s far more resistance than a near free-fall scenario.
In conclusion what you have is the remaining alleged unaffected floors below have absolutely no resistance at all. This was not a buckling or pancake collapse as the NIST and Propaganda Scence magazine claim. It’s scientifically impossible to have been buckling or pancake collapse. It’s all in the time that it took the buildings to collapse. That’s your smoking gun.
Go back and review some photos from the police helicopter on 9/11 and it points to a man made pyroclastic explosion of some type regardless of what Elliott thinks or spouts off. So just ignore him