This means that the law of conservation would have prevented a pancake collapse from happening. Because all of the material was pulverized. If it were pulverized you can’t have the sum of mass+ velocity to come up with the momentum for a pancake collapse. You can’t have energy going into pulverization and also collapsing the floor below it. Sorry couldn’t happen, there’s not enough kinetic energy. Remember conservation of energy does not allow energy to be used twice. And in the end you would have a skyscraper reduced to 30 stories or possibly 40 stories remaining not 4 to 6 stories of rubble. You’re stuck in a circular reference. You have failed logic
No Comments
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.