Loading ...Even if the 3% death rate were to go global, it would burn out when only the survivors are left.
Given the population growth in Africa and India, this so-called epidemic is a drop in the bucket.
“We’re gonna to need a bigger boat”, ie. a meaner virus. Much meaner, if you want to reduce the world population by a significant percentage. You would need something that has 99 percent mortality rate for 90% of the population. It would also need a long incubation (4-10 weeks, not 4-10 days) for it to spread universally.
…
EVERYONE here is missing the Strategic Intent of this nCoV virus, if it is a release of an attenuated and patented version of the original Coronavirus (CoV) from a few years ago:
With a mild 3 to 6% mortality rate, the intent cannot possibly be to reduce the population anywhere. That’s just basic math (ye math numbskulls and logic failures).The far more devious, subtle, but potent intent is to dial in just the right mortality rate to crash China’s economy and with it it’s political system. All without firing a single missile.
If the Swine epidemic doesn’t crash the CCP, maybe this nCoV will. If not, the next version — with a 10-20% mortality rate — might.
Has the penny dropped? Has the light finally gone ON, ye shining 5W lightbulbs?