Loading ...was very interesting…Saylor had his statistics down pat so far.He was formidable debater .He did his homework and won the words game of debating .
Giustra had a historical perspective ,pointed out Bit Coin is Gambling because it has NO history.Pointed out the Governments will not allow the Competition for their ability to create money and use that to keep their monopoly .Governments will not allow it to become a threat .So Gold was a better store of value ,it has Government on its side since Government has shown it can control Gold .It cant control Bit Coin. He is not against holding some bit Coin .He understands its value if Governments dont crush it. He holds a common sense approach,Saylor has a all or none gamblers approach . It works until it dont. Both men are very bright no debate about that .I was surprised at Saylors ability to process words and statistics .I think Saylor won the short term words debate ,but Giustra won the logical common sense long view debate .