I hope they pursue it to the Supreme Court. The lower courts have been compromised and why the people should prevent the left from appointed judges to the Supreme Court like they tried to do with Garland and look at him now. I don’t see any ethics committee going after him when they should.
The people who paid for the boxes unless they have any real evidence of crime are the the innocent party and their assets should be returned. It’s money hunting and theft. If the bank had a problem they had no right bothering private property unless they could be linked to them acquiring these assets in a crime.
It’s no different than the con game dirty cops in Mexico pulls on tourists. They pull them over saying they did something they didn’t do or made something up then tell them they will have to go to court even could get their car towed or they could settle it right now by paying them.
If they say I’ll just go to court and stand their ground they’ll likely just give a warning and leave.
They might even get another dirty cop involved to make it look official. There is no law that permits the cop to take the money, he’s lying and if it was a infraction wouldn’t cost that much they try to get from you.
The difference is the courts are cracking down on these cops and if they get caught doing that they’ll be fired not rewarded with some of the money like they’re doing.
That’s why they’ll leave if you insist you want to go to court. Plus regular cops can’t give tickets. They have both regular cops and trafic cops and regular cops don’t even have ticket books or the word traffic on their cars. Here the lower courts appear to be in on it.
Although in Mexico if you get in a accident with another car they will take both party’s to jail until they figure out who’s fault it is and who’s going to pay. So you best have Mexican insurance and the kind that will bail you out,
These are the kind of things that slowly led up to the blow up with cops and to defund them. I’m surprised they left the lower courts out of it. This time anyways.