I thought the reason for the electors was so that each of the nine electoral districts in Colorado had an equal say in the election. That is, some districts have little population but their say was as important as other electoral districts where there was vast populations, and the electors in the low populated areas had to vote whatever the popular vote was in THEIR electoral district. Otherwise the electors mean nothing if the large populated areas control the outcome of the “popular” vote.
Am I wrong or is this judge wrong??????